|
The Global Context of Net-Art. Please note: this document contains an addendum at the end of the text as of July 20, 2003 (Net Art World was officially launched on July 1, 2003). This adjustment was made because it was brought to my attention that the reasons for using Google and The World Factbook are not clear enough in the main text. Please read the end note for more details. The
online
project
Net
Art
World
1.0
was
developed
for
The
InteractivA
2003
New
Media
Biennale
taking
place
at
MACAY
in
All
of
the
information
comes
from
popular
websites.
The
country
maps
were
accessed
at
The
2002
World
Factbook,
the
country
flags
were
taken
from
The
World
Flag
Database,
and
the
artist
links
were
accessed
at
the
2003
Net
Art
Links
website.
This
approach
seemed
to
be
the
most
reasonable
because
it
uses
pre-existing
resources
that
hold
a
certain
cultural
authority.
This
also
enabled
me
to
take
on
the
role
of
compiler,
choosing
the
online
resources
based
on
their
reliability
and
popularity,
which
is
not
different
from
how
the
average
person
may
surf
the
web.
The
approach
as
a
compiler
also
exposes
the
many
roles
net-practitioners
take
when
functioning
in
the
community,
which
are
of
artists,
curators,
writers,
and
administrators. This
project
consists
of
four
framesets,
functioning
as
follows: á
The
main
area
presents
a
net-artist
selected
at
random
from
a
list
created
by
Dr.
Reinhold
Grether. á
The
top-right
frame
presents
a
country
flag
selected
at
random
from
a
database.
This
flag
links
to
a
series
of
images
on
Google
related
to
the
country
the
flag
represents. á
The
middle-right
frame
presents
a
country
map
at
random.
This
map
links
to
statistical
information
about
a
country.
Please
note
that
the
country
map
does
not
correspond
with
the
flag.
This
is
done
to
present
the
complexity
of
nationalism,
patriotism
and
colonialism
that
has
developed
due
to
globalization.
á
The
bottom-right
frame
presents
an
image
selected
at
random
from
a
series
of
images
that
were
accessed
on
Google
when
searching
the
term
"Globalization." Net
Art
World
1.0
was
created
to
examine
the
state
of
net-art
in
2003,
which
is
why
the
links
throughout
the
project
are
not
dynamically
updated
as
the
information
changes
on
the
net.
This
approach
was
chosen
in
order
to
point
to
the
period
in
new
media
history
from
June
to
September
of
2003.
After
this
time,
the
links
may
become
broken
and/or
the
actual
resources
become
updated
with
new
information;
this
way,
the
piece
becomes
time
specific.
Anyone
interested
in
accessing
the
latest
information
can
always
go
to
the
resource
page
and
choose
particular
links
for
the
latest
updates. In
order
to
better
understand
Net
Art
World
1.0,
it
is
important
to
note
some
events
in
the
recent
and
not
so
recent
past.
An
important
event
that
points
to
a
transition
in
new
media
is
Rhizome's
decision
to
become
a
resource
with
an
annual
membership;
which
could
be
taken
as
a
sign
of
a
more
institutionalized
and
perhaps
even
commercialized
state
of
net-art;
around
this
time
many
alternative
resources
developed
around
the
web
as
well.
[1]
Also,
reconsidering
the
efficiency
of
mailing
lists,
along
with
the
rapid
growth
of
weblogs,
are
definite
signs
that
the
net
community
is
entering
a
new
stage
of
development.[2]
Another
sign
of
change
that
has
been
developing
for
sometime
now
is
net-art
being
part
of
major
museum
exhibitions;
some
examples
are
the
Whitney
and
Venice
Biennales
which
have
included
net-art
in
their
surveys--as
well
as
Documenta
11
which
had
a
major
emphasis
on
new
media.[3]
Ironically,
all
of
the
above
developments
are
followed
by
a
currently
slow
economy
around
the
world.
This
is
also
the
time
when
a
new
generation
of
net-artists
is
coming
on
board
with
hopes
of
becoming
successful
practitioners,
similar
to
previous
generations
in
the
art
world
at
large.
This
may
be,
in
part,
due
to
the
fact
that
new
media
is
now
taught
in
universities
around
the
world;
and
this
has
led
early
net-artists
like
Vuc
Cosic
to
call
what
the
students
produce
"net-art
mannerisms."
This
is
a
far
cry
from
the
mid-nineties
when
only
a
few
artists
were
working
online
and
strategically
displacing
the
labeling
of
their
practice.[4]
Net-art
developed
after
a
late
postmodern
period
when
art
practices
were
influenced
by
poststructural
theories.
It
is
impossible
to
give
a
decent
account
in
this
short
contextualization
of
what
the
term
"postmodern"
means,
but
two
particular
thinkers
associated
with
postmodernism
are
worth
noting
for
their
extreme
positions.
While
the
philosopher
Jean-François
Lyotard
came
to
entertain
grand
narratives
as
problematic
and
considered
the
world
to
be
reaching
a
high
pluralist
state,[5]
Jurgen
Habermas
claimed
that
the
project
of
modernity
had
not
been
completed
because
such
a
project
is
split
into
three
separate
cultural
areas:
science,
morality
and
art.
[6]
Also,
Post-Colonialism
can
be
considered
part
of
the
postmodern
discourse
as
well,
as
it
has
been
questioned
along
with
poststructural
writings--most
recently
by
writers
Michael
Hardt
and
Antonio
Negri,
who
have
revisited
Marx
with
an
interdisciplinary
approach
to
better
understand
globalization.[7] In
spite
of
all
the
events
noted,
and
the
multi-faceted
theories
affecting
the
current
state
of
cultural
production,
what
is
clear
is
that
people
have
always
strived
to
progress.
This
has
never
stopped
being
true,
even
during
postmodern
times.
And
with
all
of
the
above
in
mind,
Net
Art
World
1.0
was
developed
to
expose
the
many
layers
that
run
behind
net-art
practice.
In
a
way,
the
project
brings
together
two
aspects
in
art
making
that
have
been
in
conflict
since
Kant
wrote
his
Critique
of
Judgment.[8]
Net
Art
World
1.0
presents
the
object
of
contemplation,
which
according
to
Kant
should
be
considered
with
disinterest,
functioning
in
a
political
context
that,
if
acknowledged,
would
question
the
principles
supporting
the
ability
to
pass
a
true
judgment
of
taste.
With
this,
two
extreme
positions
in
art
practice
are
challenged:
the
privileged
position
of
disinterest
and
the
position
aiming
to
develop
a
more
democratic
state
of
production
by
questioning
the
privileged
position.
This
is
done
in
order
to
push
both
ideological
camps
into
a
productive
state
of
education,
while
knowing
that
the
two
areas
crossover
in
multiple
ways--which
is
why
art
practice
has
become
extremely
slippery.
Net
Art
World
1.0
was
designed
to
create
global
awareness,
as
I
believe
that
only
by
deconstructing
such
tensions,
only
by
placing
them
next
to
each
other,
can
culture
move
on
to
a
new
state
of
development.
Global
awareness
is
not
a
luxury
but
a
necessity,
and
Net
Art
World
1.0
was
developed
as
a
resource
where
people
can
enjoy
net-art
and
learn
something
about
the
world
simultaneously. [1]
This
transition
happened
between
November
and
January
of
2003.
Rhizome
received
heavy
criticism
from
the
net-art
community
at
large.
Some
of
this
criticism
can
be
found
at
http://www.nettime.org.
Threads
worth
reading
to
better
understand
the
complexity
of
the
matter
are:
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0301/msg00059.html,
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0301/msg00089.html,
and
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0301/msg00131.html
[2]
Google
buying
Blogger
is
perhaps
the
most
noted
event
bringing
mass
popularity
to
blogging:
http://blogger.com/about/blogger_google_faq.pyra.
Since
this
merge,
several
blogs
have
been
launched.
[3]
Documenta
11:
http://www.documenta.de/documenta_blau.html,
Venice
Biennale:
http://www.documenta.de/documenta_blau.html,
Whitney
Biennale:
http://artport.whitney.org/exhibitions/past-exhibitions.shtml.
[4]
Josephine
Bosma,
"The
Dot
on
a
Velvet
Pillow
--
Net.Art
Nostalgia
and
Net
Art
Today"
[5] Jean-François Lyotard, "The Nature of the Social Bond," The Postmodern Condition, (Minneapolis: Minnesota, 1984), 11-14. In these particular pages Jean-Francois Lyotard dismisses grand-narratives including Marxism, and claims the way for little narratives. Lyotard is used as an example of postmodernism because of his extreme position--especially against Jurgen Habermas. The two philosophers have been compared by scholars in order to better understand what the term postmodern might mean. See: Emilia Steuerman, "Habermas vs. Lyotard? Modernity vs. Postmodernity," Judging Lyotard, ed. Andrew Benjamin (New York: Routledge, 1992) 99-118. [6]
Jurgen
Habermas,
"An
Incomplete
Project,"
The
Anti-Aesthetic,
ed.
Hal
Foster
(New
York:
The
New
Press,
1983),
3-15.
In
this
short
essay,
which
is
an
acceptance
speech
for
the
Theodor
Adorno
Prize
from
the
city
of
[7]
Michael
Hardt
&
Antonio
Negri,
"Symptoms
of
Passage,"
Empire,
( [8] Immanuel Kant, "Part One, Critique of the Aesthetical Judgment," Critique of Judgment, (New York: Hafner, 1951) 37-82. The approach taken to develop Net Art World 1.0 is influenced by the work of Marcel Duchamp. Like Duchamp, I have taken everyday objects, in my case sources from the internet, and recontextualized these as art. This creates a slippery bridge between the space of aesthetics and the everyday world. See: Thierry de Duve, "Kant after Duchamp," Kant after Duchamp, (Cambridge, Massachusetts: 1996) 283-325. |